Steven Quiring
Department of Geography
Texas A&M
Table of Contents:
Teaching Philosophy
Teaching Experience
Responsibilities
Courses
taught
Other
relevant experience
Teaching
methods and strategies
Teaching
interests
Measures of Teaching
Effectiveness
Selected
Responses from Student Evaluations
Selected
Student Comments
Efforts to Enhance Teaching
Future Teaching Goals
Appendices
As a teacher, I feel that my main roles are to serve as a guide and a mentor for the students and to facilitate learning. As a result of my experiences teaching introductory courses in physical geography and upper-level courses in climatology to classes of between 8 and 150 students, I have found that I can reach my students most effectively by developing rapport and by showing enthusiasm for the course material. To be an effective guide and mentor for the students requires developing good rapport. I work to build rapport with my students by encouraging them to meet with me outside of class to ask questions and discuss course material, and by taking a personal interest in their lives. As I get to know the students, I am able to personalize the course by using examples and illustrations that they can relate to. My enthusiasm for teaching physical geography/climatology is consistently recognized in my course evaluations. I have found that when I am excited about the material being covered in class, this excitement rubs off on the students and helps to facilitate the learning process.
I have two main teaching objectives. My primary objective is to provide students with a solid understanding of climatology and physical geography (e.g. how the physical world works, the importance of human-environment interactions, etc.). As a teacher it is my job to facilitate student learning by taking complex issues and ideas and presenting them in an understandable manner. Students process information most effectively when they are actively involved in analyzing and processing it, rather than just passively soaking it up. Therefore, I also facilitate student learning by offering classes that involve analyzing, criticizing, evaluating, discussing, and formulating. I have found that if you tell students something (lecture) they will forget, if you show them (demonstration) they might remember, but if you get them involved (lab, exercise, or activity) they are most likely to remember and understand. Therefore, in addition to presenting material through a traditional lecture format, my classes also incorporate other activities such as discussions, in-class exercises, demonstrations, hands-on activities, and case studies. When I first started teaching, my classes primarily involved lecturing. I have since realized that when students are more actively involved in the learning process, they gain a better understanding of the material and they have more fun. This is one area of my teaching that I am continuing to develop. Since not all of the students have the same preferred learning style another way that I facilitate student learning is by catering to different learning styles (e.g. aural, visual, read/write, kinesthetic). For example, I make extensive use of technology when I teach. My lectures are presented using PowerPoint because I have found that this an excellent way to augment the presentation of a topic with visual material such as pictures, diagrams, and animations. In addition, my courses have a companion web site where students can access additional information about the lecture material, review the course notes, download assignments, and explore related sites on the Internet. I also have incorporated videos and movie clips into my courses. Varying the methods by which the material is presented allows me to appeal to a range of learning styles.
My secondary objective is to help students develop important skills that they can utilize no matter what career they choose. In particular, I think that it is important for students to learn how to learn, learn how to think for themselves, and develop effective written and verbal communication skills. My role is to model these skills for the students by demonstrating how I think critically, generate and test hypotheses, and evaluate the research of others. I like to structure my courses so that as the semester progresses students are required to complete assignments that are increasingly challenging. For example, to develop verbal communication skills I will start by having students answer questions in class and participate in discussions, then they will give a brief presentation to the class, and finally at the end of the semester they may be required to participate in a debate or give a final project presentation. This allows me to guide their development by providing appropriate activities that will help them improve their communication skills. The constructive feedback that I provide after each assignment helps them to build on their strengths and improve on their weaknesses.
I find teaching to be both an incredibly
challenging
and rewarding endeavor. It is challenging because each student is
unique, having different backgrounds, expectations, skills, learning
styles,
and differing levels of prior knowledge. As a result, I must be
flexible
in my approach to teaching so that I can meet the unique learning needs
of each student and make the material interesting and relevant to their
lives. Teaching is also very rewarding because if I have done my
job well, my students will have acquired valuable knowledge, learned
important
life-skills, and gained a greater sense of curiosity about the world
around
them.
Texas A&M University
University of
Delaware
University of
Manitoba
As a professor and instructor I have been
responsible
for all teaching and administrative duties associated with delivering
these
courses. These duties included designing the course syllabus,
selecting
the textbook, creating and delivering lectures, administering and
grading
tests and assignments, holding office hours, and determining final
grades. Please refer to Appendices A, B, and
C for
examples
of course syllabi, lecture notes, and class assignments.
Teaching Methods
and Strategies:
I make use of many different teaching strategies
in my courses. Five of these strategies are described in more
detail
below.
1) Varying presentation style
Varying the methods by which the material is
presented allows me to appeal to a range of learning styles. My
lectures
are primarily presented using PowerPoint because I have found that this
an excellent way to incorporate visual material such as pictures,
diagrams,
and animations. I also like to incorporate videos and movie
clips
into my courses and use demonstrations to communicate new concepts to
the
students.
2) In-class exercises
I routinely use in-class exercises to help the
students to learn, understand, and apply the material covered in the
readings
and lectures. I require the students to complete these exercises
in small groups (3-4 students) to encourage them to work with each
other
and learn from each other. The group responses are graded and the
answers are discussed at the beginning of the next class.
3) Course web site
I create a web site for all of my courses where
students can access additional information about the lecture material,
review the course notes, download assignments, and explore related
sites
on the Internet.
4) Making connections between course content
and
the real world
I believe that its’ important for an instructor
to help students make connections to the real world because “seeing
these
connections” can motivate the students to learn the more theoretical
material.
I want students to be able to answer questions such as: Why are we
studying
this? What is the purpose of this course? Am I ever going
to
use what is covered in this course? Making connections is
particularly
important in introductory courses because they are taught to a diverse
group of students from a variety of disciplines. One of the ways
I like to develop connections between the course and the real world is
to use current events as teaching tools (as the subject of in-class
exercises,
to explain a concept, etc.).
5) Regular assessment and feedback
I employ short, so-called “one-minute papers”
as a means to assess how well the students understood the material that
was presented. The minute paper is an activity that can be used
at
any point during a lecture. Students are given two or three
minutes
to write a few sentences on a piece of paper or cue card that summarize
the important concepts that have been covered in the lecture. An
alternative approach is to have the students write down what they did
not
understand from the lecture (what was unclear, also known as the
muddiest
point). I collect these cards from the students and use them to
clarify
what the students didn’t understand at the beginning of the next class.
Teaching Interests:
I teach undergraduate and
graduate courses in climatology, hydroclimatology and physical
geography.
I can also teach selected quantitative methods and technique
courses.
A selected list of course titles is included below.
Climatology, Hydrology, Physical Geography:
Introduction to Physical Geography/Earth Systems Science
Weather and Climate
Hydroclimatology
Physical Climatology
Applied Climatology
Micro/Synoptic Climatology
Hydrology/Hydrological Modeling
Methods and Techniques:
Quantitative (Statistical) Methods
Spatial Data Analysis
Computational Methods in Environmental Research
Selected Responses
from End-of-Term Quantitative Student Evaluations
(A complete
package of student
evaluations for each course is available upon request)
|
Evaluation Questions |
GEOG
324 Global Climatic Regions (Fall 2007) [N = 12 out of 19] |
GEOG
203 Planet Earth: Introduction to Earth System Science (Fall 2007) [N = 50 out of 75] |
GEOG
434 Hydrology & Environment (Spring 2008) [N = out of 21] |
GEOG
689 Applied Climatology (Spring 2008) [N = out of 5] |
| Overall course
evaluation |
||||
| 2) This course was
challenging to me. |
4.08 |
4.42 | ||
| 3) All things
considered, I have benefitted from taking this course. |
4.08 |
4.30 | ||
| 4) I would recommend
this course to other students. |
3.92 |
4.26 | ||
| 6) Instructor was
well prepared for the class. |
4.33 |
4.84 | ||
| 7) Instructor was
effective at communicating. |
4.42 |
4.76 | ||
| 8) The course was
well organized. |
4.08 |
4.66 | ||
| 10) Instructor was
fair in determining grades. |
4.17 |
4.57 | ||
| 11) Instructor was
responsive to students' course-related questions and problems. |
4.42 |
4.70 | ||
| 14) Overall in this
course, I would rate this instructor highly. |
4.50 |
4.68 | ||
|
Evaluation Questions |
GEOG
324 Global Climatic Regions (Fall 2006) [N =11 out of 17] |
GEOG
203 Planet Earth: Introduction to Earth System Science (Fall 2006) [N = 105 out of 132] |
GEOG
434 Hydrology & Environment (Spring 2007) [N = 6 out of 8] |
GEOG
203 Planet Earth: Introduction to Earth System Science (Spring 2007) [N = 116 out of 150] |
| Overall course
evaluation |
4.26 |
4.26 |
4.42 |
4.51 |
| 2) This course was
challenging to me. |
4.27 |
4.38 |
4.50 |
4.29 |
| 3) All things
considered, I have benefitted from taking this course. |
4.45 |
4.28 |
4.33 |
4.10 |
| 4) I would recommend
this course to other students. |
3.82 |
4.33 |
3.83 |
4.25 |
| 6) Instructor was
well prepared for the class. |
4.45 |
4.74 |
4.83 |
4.90 |
| 7) Instructor was
effective at communicating. |
4.36 |
4.69 |
4.83 |
4.79 |
| 8) The course was
well organized. |
4.27 |
4.53 |
4.67 |
4.75 |
| 10) Instructor was
fair in determining grades. |
4.36 |
4.55 |
4.67 |
4.64 |
| 11) Instructor was
responsive to students' course-related questions and problems. |
4.55 |
4.73 |
5.00 |
4.79 |
| 14) Overall in this
course, I would rate this instructor highly. |
4.27 |
4.66 |
4.67 |
4.78 |
|
Evaluation Questions |
GEOG
324 Global Climatic Regions (Fall 2005) [N =15 out of 21] |
GEOG
203 Planet Earth: Introduction to Earth System Science (Spring 2006) [N = 64 out of 98] |
GEOG
203 Honors Planet Earth: Introduction to Earth System Science (Spring 2006) [N = 7 out of 9] |
|
| 1) Overall course
evaluation |
4.41 |
4.70 |
4.97 |
|
| 2) This course was
challenging to me. |
4.13 |
4.34 |
5.00 |
|
| 3) All things
considered, I have benefitted from taking this course. |
3.60 |
4.44 |
5.00 |
|
| 4) I would recommend
this course to other students. |
5.00 |
4.46 |
5.00 |
|
| 7) Instructor was
well prepared for the class. |
4.53 |
4.88 |
5.00 |
|
| 8) Instructor was
effective at communicating. |
4.20 |
4.85 |
5.00 |
|
| 9) The course was
well organized. |
4.40 |
4.84 |
5.00 |
|
| 10) Instructor was
fair in determining grades. |
4.27 |
4.77 |
4.86 |
|
| 11) Instructor was
responsive to students' course-related questions and problems. |
4.73 |
4.79 |
5.00 |
|
| 12) Overall in this
course, I would rate this instructor highly. |
4.87 |
4.87 |
5.00 |
|
|
Evaluation Questions |
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems (Summer 2001) [N=16] |
Introduction to Physical Geography (Summer 2002) [N=13] |
Climate Processes Lab (Fall 2002) [N=30] |
Introduction to Physical Geography (Winter 2004) [N=12] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6) Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate. | 75.0% | 84.6% | 70.0% | 83.3% |
| 7) Instructor's explanations were clear. | 87.5% | 69.2% | 80.0% | 91.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Student
Comments
End-of-Term Qualitative Student Evaluations
(A complete package of student
comments is available upon request)
Student comments are organized around three themes: instructor enthusiasm and proficiency, student/instructor interactions, and classroom atmosphere. The following comments are a selected sample of student comments.
Instructor Enthusiasm and Proficiency:
“You are very knowledgeable about the information. Your presentation of the material makes it more understandable than other professors I have had.”
“Good job! It was interesting and fun! You were very enthusiastic!”
"The course has certainly increased my interest in the news"
“You’re very knowledgeable and were able to present a lot of information.”
“I can better understand the complexity of the weather and climatic systems since they are a daily event. It was really interesting.”
“I really enjoyed the material in this course. I had not had a science class for several years so I enjoyed learning different material and having to think a different way than usual. I also really liked the professor. The first day I came to class there were doughnuts and coffee and to me that just showed he cared about his students and wanted them to enjoy class as well as the material.”
“Mr. Quiring is enthusiastic, well organized, and very accessible to his students.”
“Enthusiasm for the class is evident; seems comfortable in front of the class and is very knowledgeable and well organized.”
Student/Instructor Interactions:
"I didn't think that I would enjoy your class but it turned out to be an enjoyable class and I got a lot out of it... I would definitely recommend this class to others."
"I really enjoyed your class and I really can't say thank you enough
for helping me through [my problems this semester]"
"While I found your class to be very challenging this semester, I
really enjoyed it and learned a lot."
“Thanks for all your help this semester.”
“Thank-you for having a good teacher/student relationship and being accessible to answer any questions we might have had.”
“He is a good teacher and a nice guy. He really cared if his students had any problems or not. He really wanted us to learn this stuff.”
“Instructor was very open to questions and answered them according to student’s learning style.”
“I appreciated your approach to this course. You obviously know the material and are enthusiastic about teaching it. I also appreciated your accessibility, you were easy to approach and your responses to questions either in person or via e-mail were always graciously given and pertinent.”
Classroom atmosphere:
“You are so funny!”
The thing I enjoyed most about this course was:
“I learned about climatology.”
“the new and interesting information I learned.”
“the in-class exercises and take-home exercises.”
“the in-class group work helped me understand and apply the lectures.”
“the use of PowerPoint – this makes it very easy on students to comprehend the lecture material.”
“(the instructor) thoroughly explained all aspects of the course material. He added to the PowerPoint presentation with numerous diagrams and animations.”
I believe that being a good teacher involves more than just knowing a lot about your subject area. Teaching is a skill that can be improved with guidance and practice. I have devoted significant time and effort to improving my teaching abilities. For example, I have enhanced my teaching by participating in the Higher Education Teaching Certification program offered by the Center for Teaching Effectiveness at the University of Delaware. This program offers a number of courses in topics like Pedagogy, Learning in the University Classroom, and Faculty Roles. My participation in this program has forced me to critically examine how I teach and to evaluate my strengths and weaknesses as a teacher. This self-examination has helped me to highlight those areas that I need to continue to develop. In addition, through this program I have become familiar with 'best practices in teaching' and been introduced to the literature on teaching and higher education in my discipline.
I have recently co-authored a paper that
focuses on pedagogy:
Levia, D. F. and S. M. Quiring (in press) An Analytical
Rubric for Assessment of Student
Learning in a Hybrid PBL Capstone Seminar: A Template for Other Courses
in
Geography Curricula. Journal of Geography
in Higher Education.
I have a number of additional papers in
preparation that focus on the scholarship of teaching geography in
higher education.
Over the next few years I plan to improve my
teaching
by focusing on the following goals:
1) Continue to implement active learning
strategies
within my classroom.
I have been making a conscious effort to
supplement the lecture material in my classes by providing other
activities
such as discussions, in-class exercises, demonstrations, hands-on
activities,
and case studies. These activities were valuable because they
increased
student interest in the course and they helped the students connect
with
and learn the material. On the end-of-term evaluations many of
the
students commented that they would have enjoyed (even) more in-class
exercises
and activities.
2) Developing
new labs for GEOG 203 and GEOG 324
Over the next year I am planning on developing new labs for the
undergraduate classes that I teach at Texas A&M. These labs
will involve collecting, analyzing, and visualizing (using Google
Earth) climate data.
3) Developing more learner-centered syllabi
In the learner-centered syllabus I focus on what
I want the students to be able to do (and know) as a result of taking a
particular course. Once I have clearly defined measurable
learning
objectives and established grading criteria and standards of
performance,
I can then use these learning objectives to define the course content
and
select appropriate course assignments. A learner-centered
syllabus
helps ensure that the students clearly know what they are expected to
learn
(both in terms of content and skills) and it helps me to make sure that
they successfully reach these goals.
Appendix A: Course Syllabi
GEOG
203:
Planet Earth: Introduction to Earth System Science
GEOG
324: Global Climatic Regions
Appendix B: Lecture Notes, Examples of Assignments and
Exercises
All course-related
materials and information are available through WebCT
Vista or by
request.
Appendix
C: Strategies for increasing
active
learning in large introductory Physical Geography classes
Paper
prepared as part of Higher Education Teaching Certification Program